From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 10 22:22:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B67E40A for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC62A1BBF for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2cYX-1WooDF2fPZ-00sJbL; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:22:00 +0200 Message-ID: <53471988.80308@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:22:00 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Katsuya Higuchi Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: www/apache22 References: <5345B7D8.6060204@jt-sys.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <5345B7D8.6060204@jt-sys.co.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:dmYZytNnAL7XnXIe2RSZ/FzzlPBggJRDsiqRmS2ynohp8GQrnEo cmbyA45vZ2BdPxv/F3GVvRuvldzU5gvr00P8Ygv4tOQJtbXbBq0XDWKvLQdaBt8b1DMr7lQ PfKpuwTzRJ9TSWggygvltcQa/UtlDM4sJwTnktE/TEK4m/ZfDWKhVB6DbizdnpiQ7KY3Zlk WKG1//07Dg2vkM2hUkmzw== Cc: apache@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:22:12 -0000 On 2014-04-09 23:12, Katsuya Higuchi wrote: > Dear Sir, > > www/apache22 2.2.27_1 has little problem. > ports-mgmt/poudriere installs security/openssl for www/apache22 at > build-depends. > This causes empty OPENSSL_INSTALLED at post-patch. > Please refer an attached picture. > > So, I think that the patch should be inserted to pre-configure. > ... Hi Katsuya Higuchi, Thanks for the *very good* report an explanation! Your fix was committed to the ports tree. -- Regards, olli