From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jan 13 12:57:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D8137B402 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:57:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0417.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.43.162] helo=mindspring.com) by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16PrgV-0001yM-00; Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:56:56 -0800 Message-ID: <3C41F495.3660F8F6@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:56:53 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy Cc: Bruce Evans , Peter Wemm , Alfred Perlstein , Kelly Yancey , Nate Williams , Daniel Eischen , Dan Eischen , Archie Cobbs , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for review: getcontext, setcontext, etc References: <3C4001A3.5ECCAEB9@mindspring.com> <20020112205919.E5372-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020114074238.S561@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Jeremy wrote: > Also, how expensive is a DNA trap? Would it be cheaper overall to > always load FPU context on a switch - this is more expensive for > processes that don't use FP, but saves a DNA trap per context switch > (assuming they use FP in that slice) for those that do. I'd like to see a kernel that saves FPU state always benched against a kernel that does lazy binding, using the "make world weighted average of three runs" benchmark. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message