Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 08:41:21 +0700 (ICT) From: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> To: chris@sigd.net Cc: beech@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2.1 to 6.2 Migration. Message-ID: <200711050141.lA51fLtQ005878@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC220F34B3B4@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> (chris@sigd.net) References: <011e01c81e3a$82335dc0$6501a8c0@GRANT> <44sl3m7ogj.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC220F34B36D@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <200711040131.59446.beech@freebsd.org> <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC220F34B3B4@ms05.mailstreet2003.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I prefer to do [build|install]world prior to building the kernel > with the new installed tools. > > Even with an outsynced system, the most common tools to be affected > are ps and top. Even when a kernel fails to boot all the > way through, you can still rebuild a new kernel after booting > with the old kernel. Having the new system tools will not > hurt. Am I wrong thinking that even when running an old system (kernel and tools) for the buildkernel step, only new tools (/usr/src/...) are being used? Bests, Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200711050141.lA51fLtQ005878>