Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 Aug 2018 22:57:13 -0700
From:      Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
To:        Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
Cc:        Mark Millard via freebsd-uboot <freebsd-uboot@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: poudriere-devel build of sysutils/u-boot-pine64 | u-boot-pine64-2018.07_1 failed
Message-ID:  <DD97C57E-D956-4CB3-B306-E31F07192B1B@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180802060927.72eadf5b1f8fe8bcf8860dc3@bidouilliste.com>
References:  <451D906A-3807-4029-BFFA-1A00AD8FB0F9@yahoo.com> <6D377AEB-C359-4DC3-A95F-2A4A72CBF090@yahoo.com> <20180801095942.91dfc4d5907b75b4fe63c1d0@bidouilliste.com> <E88C0B8E-F28C-457E-8A13-4CB593F72FA3@yahoo.com> <20180802060927.72eadf5b1f8fe8bcf8860dc3@bidouilliste.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2018-Aug-1, at 9:09 PM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu at bidouilliste.com> =
wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 07:02:08 -0700
> Mark Millard via freebsd-uboot <freebsd-uboot at freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 2018-Aug-1, at 12:59 AM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu at bidouilliste.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>>> . . .
>>=20
>> Definitely true that I do not yet know what matters for this context.
>> I'll continue to try to figure that out.
>=20
> Well it's a port and you are building via poudriere so just put the
> log file (the full log file) somewhere so we can have a look.
> Also arch, ports tree revision, blah, the usual suspects.

The build did not get far: the log file is only 747 lines long. I'll
probably submit a bugzilla for the issue at some point. I'll report
the number when I do.

I suggest looking at:

=
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2018-August/113981.html

for a recent build failure type that I analyzed (devel/*-gcc failures). =
John Baldwin
reduced the history down to the final result for our exchanges and so it =
will will not
be a long read. The issue was tied to my use of WITHOUT_BINTUILS for the =
buildworld
that was installed and in use but devel/powerpc64-gcc (the master port =
for the
devel/*-gcc ports) not listing devel/binutils in BUILD_DEPENDS in =
addition to the
historical devel/${PKGNAMEPREFIX}binutils for the cross-build.

Other gcc-ish ports that cross-build things may have similar issues with =
expecting
but missing "builder-architecture" tools from binutils. I'm not claiming =
that is
the problem here but it is a fairly new type of problem to be aware of.



Just FYI for the pine64 u-boot port context:
(To be in the bugzilla submittal as well.)

# uname -apKU
FreeBSD FBSDUSSD 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT  r336693M  amd64 =
amd64 1200075 1200075

(The "M" is mostly for experiments targeting powerpc and powerpc64
via fairly modern toolchains. The poudriere-devel jail uses an
install-tree installed from the same buildworld.)

# svnlite info /usr/ports/ | grep "Re[plv]"
Relative URL: ^/head
Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports
Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5
Revision: 476026
Last Changed Rev: 476026



=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DD97C57E-D956-4CB3-B306-E31F07192B1B>