Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 22:57:13 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: Mark Millard via freebsd-uboot <freebsd-uboot@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere-devel build of sysutils/u-boot-pine64 | u-boot-pine64-2018.07_1 failed Message-ID: <DD97C57E-D956-4CB3-B306-E31F07192B1B@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20180802060927.72eadf5b1f8fe8bcf8860dc3@bidouilliste.com> References: <451D906A-3807-4029-BFFA-1A00AD8FB0F9@yahoo.com> <6D377AEB-C359-4DC3-A95F-2A4A72CBF090@yahoo.com> <20180801095942.91dfc4d5907b75b4fe63c1d0@bidouilliste.com> <E88C0B8E-F28C-457E-8A13-4CB593F72FA3@yahoo.com> <20180802060927.72eadf5b1f8fe8bcf8860dc3@bidouilliste.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2018-Aug-1, at 9:09 PM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu at bidouilliste.com> = wrote: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 07:02:08 -0700 > Mark Millard via freebsd-uboot <freebsd-uboot at freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 2018-Aug-1, at 12:59 AM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu at bidouilliste.com> = wrote: >>=20 >>> . . . >>=20 >> Definitely true that I do not yet know what matters for this context. >> I'll continue to try to figure that out. >=20 > Well it's a port and you are building via poudriere so just put the > log file (the full log file) somewhere so we can have a look. > Also arch, ports tree revision, blah, the usual suspects. The build did not get far: the log file is only 747 lines long. I'll probably submit a bugzilla for the issue at some point. I'll report the number when I do. I suggest looking at: = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2018-August/113981.html for a recent build failure type that I analyzed (devel/*-gcc failures). = John Baldwin reduced the history down to the final result for our exchanges and so it = will will not be a long read. The issue was tied to my use of WITHOUT_BINTUILS for the = buildworld that was installed and in use but devel/powerpc64-gcc (the master port = for the devel/*-gcc ports) not listing devel/binutils in BUILD_DEPENDS in = addition to the historical devel/${PKGNAMEPREFIX}binutils for the cross-build. Other gcc-ish ports that cross-build things may have similar issues with = expecting but missing "builder-architecture" tools from binutils. I'm not claiming = that is the problem here but it is a fairly new type of problem to be aware of. Just FYI for the pine64 u-boot port context: (To be in the bugzilla submittal as well.) # uname -apKU FreeBSD FBSDUSSD 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r336693M amd64 = amd64 1200075 1200075 (The "M" is mostly for experiments targeting powerpc and powerpc64 via fairly modern toolchains. The poudriere-devel jail uses an install-tree installed from the same buildworld.) # svnlite info /usr/ports/ | grep "Re[plv]" Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 476026 Last Changed Rev: 476026 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DD97C57E-D956-4CB3-B306-E31F07192B1B>