From owner-freebsd-security Thu Sep 28 19:10:26 1995 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA13885 for security-outgoing; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 19:10:26 -0700 Received: from hemi.com (hemi.com [204.132.158.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA13880 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 19:10:20 -0700 Received: (from mbarkah@localhost) by hemi.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA08497; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 20:13:25 -0600 From: Ade Barkah Message-Id: <199509290213.UAA08497@hemi.com> Subject: Re: are we affected? To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 20:13:24 -0600 (MDT) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, pst@cisco.com, wollman@lcs.mit.edu, security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199509290027.BAA04090@keltia.freenix.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Sep 29, 95 01:27:11 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 847 Sender: owner-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Vic Abell does not have access to a 2.2-CURRENT for now. Current versions > should work on 2.0, 2.0.5 and 2.1 (as the VM didn't change in 2.1 as in > 2.2). I exchanged a few mail with him and a guy who allowed to use his > 2.0.5 system to do the port about it. > > Vic is willing to do a port if he can maintain it (ie can have a permanent > account on the system). Yes. I'm planning to put a -current machine this weekend, which Vic will have access to. Barring major problems, that is. His sources have had native support for 2.0.5 for awhile now (as well as for all previous FreeBSD official releases.) Regards, -Ade -------------------------------------------------------------------- Inet: mbarkah@hemi.com - HEMISPHERE ONLINE - www: --------------------------------------------------------------------