Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:41:10 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-user@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r244959 - user/crees/rclint Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkyMsOK7-9CwiaDc6Lbwf_AvZU9uzJxc-O2-q=S%2B1j9Vw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-waM-s81DxZu5iJWFS69wbZNKRqbAoCBpU8D33Kr2qvA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201301021647.r02GlOJS024879@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgkkQSNjBSPrgcAe4Ze-t2_g=DZCv4iag7_KooCho8ZAiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83-waM-s81DxZu5iJWFS69wbZNKRqbAoCBpU8D33Kr2qvA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 January 2013 04:27, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > I think a higher priority than bullet format is weeding out the last of the > "advertising clauses". These are actually distinct instead of subtly distinct. I did a sweep a while back but many licenses referenced people, not UCB. > Warner Losh has done a lot of work on this, but I think bringing it up again > may cause a nervous breakdown :) eh? -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkyMsOK7-9CwiaDc6Lbwf_AvZU9uzJxc-O2-q=S%2B1j9Vw>