Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 01:04:50 +0100 (CET) From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: groudier@club-internet.fr Cc: Marc van Woerkom <van.woerkom@netcologne.de>, ngr@symbionics.co.uk, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SC200/ncr53c810 problems Message-ID: <200002160004.BAA97277@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1000213175703.1123A-100000@localhost> References: <200002102357.AAA10864@oranje.my.domain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.LNX.3.95.1000213175703.1123A-100000@localhost> you write: > > >On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Marc van Woerkom wrote: > >> > The ncr53c810 is not PCI2.1 compliant, which I have found to matter. > >Early 53C810 are PCI-2.0 compliant. Differences between PCI-2.1 and >PCI-2.0 should not explain 53C810 failures, on paper. However hardware has >issues as software and may-be some issue can be triggerred when >associating recent hardwares with old ones. And given the zero interest >in things that donnot give income in our world, such kind of problem will >for sure be ignored. Didn't the 53C810 have the problem that some of its controller instruction caused io cycles to appear on the bus that were in fact internal, violating the latest PCI standards? and only the later symbios' have replacements for these instructions that no longer do that... or was that something else that i remember? curious, -- Juergen Lock <nox.foo@jelal.kn-bremen.de> (remove dot foo from address to reply) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002160004.BAA97277>