From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jun 29 15:13:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC8BD9F7C2 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08A4C3689 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v5TFDqln096348 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:13:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 186114] net/mpd5 hangs after a certain number of users connect Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:13:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: kib@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:13:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D186114 --- Comment #97 from Konstantin Belousov --- (In reply to Cassiano Peixoto from comment #92) Indeed, everything I asked for, is in the comment #83. Now I cannot make a sense from the reported line 4802 of rtld.c in the backtrace for the thread 100704. There is no lock call neither in stable/11 nor in HEAD, at this li= ne.=20 What exact version of the sources do you use, from which branch ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=