From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 5 14:59:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B77106566B for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 14:59:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46D88FC0C for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 14:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QI01s-0001Ul-HN for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:59:48 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:59:48 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 16:59:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 16:59:36 +0200 Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <65D3163B-427B-41F6-80B9-7BA4AF794939@vicor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: [UPDATE] New Boot-Loader Menu -- version 1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 14:59:50 -0000 On 05/05/2011 15:40, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 5 May 2011, Devin Teske wrote: > >> Running on i386-compatible hardware supporting ACPI: >> B&W (standard): http://twitpic.com/4tlsin >> Color (loader_color=YES): http://twitpic.com/4tlt6l > > Looks nice. Options 3, 4, and 5 could be changed to > > 3. Safe Mode > 4. Single User Mode > 5. Verbose > > On/Off or Enabled/Disabled might be bikeshedably better than Yes and No. If we're going to nitpick, then the style of *Enable* Safe Mode : *YES | NO* may be even better :) While at it, I'd also suggest aligning the YES | NO fields vertically for better readability. But these are minor suggestions, it is ok the way it is :)