From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 22 07:47:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B976B16A4CE; Sat, 22 May 2004 07:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.xbsd.org (xbsd.org [81.56.254.23])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 67E1443D39; Sat, 22 May 2004 07:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from flz@xbsd.org)
Received: from xbsd.org (gatecrasher.xbsd.org [192.168.42.2])
	by gw.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B0C5458E; Sat, 22 May 2004 16:46:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <40AF4BB0.2060803@xbsd.org>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:46:40 +0200
From: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
References: <200405221303.i4MD3x7v042190@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<40AF45E7.9090405@xbsd.org> <40AF640F.7050603@fillmore-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <40AF640F.7050603@fillmore-labs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
cc: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org>
cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/67036: bsd.port.mk: Clarify PORTDOCS comment.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:47:57 -0000

Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

> I totally agree that PORTDOCS is underdocumented and should be
> explained more clearly. I appreciate efforts and didn't mean to
> scare you away. Please add a, additional patch for the Porter's
> Handbook. :)

	I'm not scared at all :)

	I'll try to dig further into this, and re-submit a PR to
	supersede this one. I'll send one to doc@ too.