From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 11 05:26:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8521F16A41C; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 05:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@dino.dnsalias.com) Received: from dino.dnsalias.com (S010600e02994cd40.vc.shawcable.net [24.80.250.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163B643D48; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 05:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@dino.dnsalias.com) Received: by dino.dnsalias.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93C0611F74B; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:26:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17066.30185.318421.273508@localhost.localdomain> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:26:01 -0700 To: Jeremie Le Hen In-Reply-To: <20050609074439.GT41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050607094848.GB16223@stack.nl> <20050607231218.GD64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608084946.GI41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050608095703.GM64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608195837.Q65103@Neo-Vortex.net> <20050608104053.GK41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050608233136.GX64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608234559.GS41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050609001004.GB64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050609080446.05c897d0@83.149.160.120> <20050609074439.GT41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.3.1 From: stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (Stephen J. Bevan) Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org, Gianmarco Giovannelli Subject: Re: Problems with gif tunnels X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 05:26:04 -0000 Jeremie Le Hen writes: > Given the simplicity of gif(4) IP-encapsulated packets, I wonder > how Linux guys could have implemented something else in their IPIP > module :-). They didn't, Linux IPIP exactly what it sounds like it does: IP in IP encapsulation. The confusion seems to be on the part of FreeBSD guys who can't tell their gre(4) from their gif(4) :-)