Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:26:01 -0700 From: stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (Stephen J. Bevan) To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD-net@freebsd.org, Gianmarco Giovannelli <gmarco@masternet.it> Subject: Re: Problems with gif tunnels Message-ID: <17066.30185.318421.273508@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20050609074439.GT41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20050607094848.GB16223@stack.nl> <20050607231218.GD64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608084946.GI41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050608095703.GM64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608195837.Q65103@Neo-Vortex.net> <20050608104053.GK41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050608233136.GX64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050608234559.GS41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050609001004.GB64194@wantadilla.lemis.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050609080446.05c897d0@83.149.160.120> <20050609074439.GT41050@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremie Le Hen writes: > Given the simplicity of gif(4) IP-encapsulated packets, I wonder > how Linux guys could have implemented something else in their IPIP > module :-). They didn't, Linux IPIP exactly what it sounds like it does: IP in IP encapsulation. The confusion seems to be on the part of FreeBSD guys who can't tell their gre(4) from their gif(4) :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17066.30185.318421.273508>