From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 11 23:01:07 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: threads@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78ED16A41F;
	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:01:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2914943D45;
	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:01:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id j9BN0lDT005812; 
	Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:00:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:00:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510111833.51168.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0510111856210.7953-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net)
Cc: threads@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: debug defines in libc_r on 6.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:01:07 -0000

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Mikhail Teterin wrote:

> Hi!
>
> It seems, libc_r is still being built with -D_LOCK_DEBUG and
> -D_PTHREADS_INVARIANTS.
>
> I suspect, this is going to slow the thread operations somewhat:

No, it's only a couple of instructions for a very few operations.
I've already replied to you about these before.  I don't care
whether re@ turns them off or not, but go read my prior email
on this topic.  I should eliminate the #defines and always do
the checks, so you wouldn't notice :(

-- 
DE