From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Feb 25  7:59: 5 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from guild.plethora.net (guild.plethora.net [205.166.146.8])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BF837B4EC
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 07:59:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from seebs@guild.plethora.net)
Received: from guild.plethora.net (seebs@localhost.plethora.net [127.0.0.1])
	by guild.plethora.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1PFx2627103
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 09:59:02 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <200102251559.f1PFx2627103@guild.plethora.net>
From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach)
Reply-To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach)
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:36:23 +0900."
             <3A98EE37.7B0B6CE0@newsguy.com> 
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 09:59:02 -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <3A98EE37.7B0B6CE0@newsguy.com>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes:
>OTOH, the *only* way to get non-overcommit to FreeBSD is for someone who
>*wants* that feature to sit down and code it. It won't happen otherwise.

So, out of idle curiousity:  If, somewhere down the road, I know the kernel
well enough to attempt such a thing, what would the interest level be in
merging such a feature?

-s

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message