Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:45:48 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A more thorough "Starting foo:" solution
Message-ID:  <4AD59DCC.9000008@andric.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AD2460A.3000902@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4AD2460A.3000902@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2009-10-11 22:54, Doug Barton wrote:
> After giving this a more thorough look I realized that there were
> quite a few places where $rc_quiet was being used directly in an rc.d
> script (16 scripts total).
> 
> I've already committed this to HEAD in order to try and make the MFC
> deadline to potentially get it into 8.0, but I do want to give y'all a
> chance to review this change as well.
> 
> If anyone objects to this change being MFC'ed to 8.0-RELEASE, or has
> other comments or suggestions please speak up ASAP.

I see no problems with MFC'ing, this is a nice way of cleaning up.

That said, there are still quite a number of scripts in rc.d that don't
check rc_quiet at all, and just echo whatever they like.

Therefore, couldn't all those "check_startmsgs && echo foo" constructs,
plus the other echo's be replaced with, say, a spam() function from
/etc/rc.subr?  This function can then check in one central location for
rc_startmsgs and decide whether to spam the console or not.

One could even start implementing some verbosity level using this... :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AD59DCC.9000008>