From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Mar 19  2:54:20 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 996B837B401; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 02:54:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from samson.dc.luth.se (samson.dc.luth.se [130.240.112.30])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F3E7043FBD; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 02:54:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bj@dc.luth.se)
Received: from ramses.dc.luth.se (bj@ramses.dc.luth.se [130.240.112.181])
	by samson.dc.luth.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2JAsCjY019106;
	Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:54:12 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <200303191054.h2JAsCjY019106@samson.dc.luth.se>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, luigi@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Ed Mooring <emooring@Lnxw.com>
Subject: Re: High CPU usage on high-bandwidth long distance connections. 
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 19 Mar 2003 02:30:58 PST.
             <20030319103058.GB39155@perrin.int.nxad.com> 
Dcc: 
Reply-To: bj@dc.luth.se
X-Disposition-notification-to: Borje.Josefsson@dc.luth.se
X-uri: http://www.dc.luth.se/~bj/index.html
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 11:54:12 +0100
From: Borje Josefsson <bj@dc.luth.se>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 02:30:58 PST Sean Chittenden wrote:

> Ooooh!  Opportune timing!  I was going to bring this up on the
> performance@ list (core@, ::hint hint::), but now's as good of a time
> as any. =


Great!

> Luigi, I've updated the patch mentioned in this email.  Could you
> review this and possibly commit it or give it a green light for being
> committed?  What's the value of conditionalizing the O(1) behavior
> anyway?  It seems like a tail append would always be the preferred
> case. =


If Luigi "blesses" this patch, I am willing to to use my two boxes as =

guinea-pigs for this, as they currently aren't used for any production =

traffic.

--B=F6rje


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message