From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jul 16 13:55:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mout1.silyn-tek.de (mout1.silyn-tek.de [194.25.165.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BFE37B6A0 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 13:55:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@big.endian.de) Received: from [192.168.32.34] (helo=mx2.silyn-tek.de) by mout1.silyn-tek.de with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 13DvRz-0004fs-00 for arch@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 22:55:47 +0200 Received: from p3e9d3899.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([62.157.56.153] helo=neutron.cichlids.com) by mx2.silyn-tek.de with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 13DvRx-0004wM-00 for arch@freebsd.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 22:55:45 +0200 Received: from cichlids.cichlids.com (cichlids.cichlids.com [192.168.0.10]) by neutron.cichlids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897BAAB91 for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 22:57:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cichlids.cichlids.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D625914A62; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 22:55:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 22:55:43 +0200 To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: final call: truncate into the base system or not? Message-ID: <20000716225543.A7308@cichlids.cichlids.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. From: alex@big.endian.de (Alexander Langer) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! How, a final and ready-to-import version of truncate exists: http://people.freebsd.org/~sheldonh/truncate/ Since I can't recall any consensus whether importing or not, but only about implementation details, I'd like to know, what the opinion of _importing_ it into the base system is, _beside_ all implementation details. Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message