From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 06:59:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C0916A402 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com) Received: from pear.silverwraith.com (pear.silverwraith.com [69.12.167.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C0743D49 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:59:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com) Received: from avleen by pear.silverwraith.com with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FeRcS-00016c-Sy for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 23:59:24 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 23:59:24 -0700 From: Avleen Vig To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060512065924.GB525@silverwraith.com> References: <44600A42.7030600@samsco.org> <44601F4A.9070802@elischer.org> <446021DE.6040507@rogers.com> <20060511210912.GA1344@zaphod.nitro.dk> <4463DC96.70908@rogers.com> <446402BB.7050201@alumni.rice.edu> <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44640422.1000006@rogers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 06:59:10 -0000 On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:42:26PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > >The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't > >some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" > >thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est > >la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of > >the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it. > > How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release > notes, not some on line version. If they're THAT big of a deal, learn some C, and fix the problems yourself, instead of sending e-mails that sound rude and ungrateful. And if you can't do that, how about helping scott put together release notes which you seemed to think were so awful? All I hear from you is complaining and a serious lack of anything constructive.