From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 11:10:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7282E106564A; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9948FC08; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id D3A281E00184; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:10:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from triton8.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p11B8ea1008761; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:08:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox@triton8.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id p11B8eaW008760; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:08:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:08:40 +0100 To: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <20110201110840.GA8591@triton8.kn-bremen.de> References: <20110131212710.GA85739@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <201102010900.11121.hselasky@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201102010900.11121.hselasky@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock Subject: Re: New dvb-s2 tuner, and a hack to get remaining remotes working X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:10:52 -0000 On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:00:11AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Monday 31 January 2011 22:27:10 Juergen Lock wrote: > > (also copied below) - I wasn't able to test this with the lirc > > port yet (it complained that it can't set /dev/lirc0 to O_NONBLOCK), > > Can you try the attached patch and report back? Hm there still seems to be something missing because there is no change... [...] 7424 irrecord CALL write(0x2,0x7fffffffe040,0x19) 7424 irrecord GIO fd 2 wrote 25 bytes "initializing '/dev/lirc0'" 7424 irrecord RET write 25/0x19 7424 irrecord CALL write(0x2,0x8008599d7,0x1) 7424 irrecord GIO fd 2 wrote 1 byte " " 7424 irrecord RET write 1 7424 irrecord CALL open(0x7fffffffeb17,O_RDONLY,0x2) 7424 irrecord NAMI "/dev/lirc0" 7424 irrecord RET open 4 7424 irrecord CALL fcntl(0x4,F_GETFL,0) 7424 irrecord RET fcntl 0 7424 irrecord CALL fcntl(0x4,F_SETFL,O_NONBLOCK) 7424 irrecord RET fcntl -1 errno 22 Invalid argument 7424 irrecord CALL write(0x2,0x7fffffffe060,0x28) 7424 irrecord GIO fd 2 wrote 40 bytes "irrecord: could not set O_NONBLOCK flag " 7424 irrecord RET write 40/0x28 Thanx, Juergen