From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 18 12:22:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7983BB; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.59.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744058FC18; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275) id 929CF7300A; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:20:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:20:43 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: regarding r242905 ('us' argument to some callout functions) was Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng Message-ID: <20121218122043.GB84347@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <20121217192731.GA83405@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20121217211112.GA84347@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Davide Italiano , freebsd-current , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:22:04 -0000 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:22:59PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Personally, I'd rather see some consistently used units here.. bintime (or something similar) is the correct choice here. If we are concerned about the size (128 bit) then we can map it to a shorter, fixed point format, such as sign+31+32 as phk was suggesting. cheers luigi