Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:54:55 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Joe Marcus Clarke" <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Current problem reports assigned to you Message-ID: <opscuhtteg9aq2h7@mezz> In-Reply-To: <1092692124.725.42.camel@gyros> References: <200408161103.i7GB3RT0097632@freefall.freebsd.org> <opscufz72n9aq2h7@mezz> <1092692124.725.42.camel@gyros>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:36:14 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 17:15, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:03:27 GMT, FreeBSD bugmaster >> <bugmaster@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> > Current FreeBSD problem reports >> > Critical problems >> > Serious problems >> > >> > S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > o [2004/08/12] ports/70343 gnome libgtkhtml won't build >> >> Do anyone know what's wrong with this? I don't have any problem when I >> built it. >> >> > o [2004/08/16] ports/70520 gnome packaged version of epiphany >> has >> > issues/d >> >> Dunno, will have to ask him what's wrong with his build via ports. Mix >> with ports and packages are not recommend, however. > > These two can probably be closed. His system has some problems. None > of these problems appear in a clean build, or a package install on a > clean system off of the GNOME Tinderbox. > >> >> > 2 problems total. >> > >> > Non-critical problems >> > >> > S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > o [2002/06/17] ports/39390 gnome Make graphics/imlib not depend >> > upon GTK+ >> >> It has been sitting for more than two years, I think it's time to close >> this PR. Agree? No reply, I will close it with my gut. > > Agree. > >> >> > o [2004/01/04] ports/60876 gnome x11/gdm2 sets overly-high >> display >> > frequen >> >> I think, this PR can be close with tell him to update his FreeBSD and >> GNOME2. Also, if his problem still exists, then contract to >> gnome@FreeBSD.org. Agree? > > Yep. > >> >> > o [2004/04/07] ports/65296 gnome noise with esd a day later >> > (audio/esound) >> >> Dunno. > > This is unreproduceable to me. I would say find out if it still happens > with 0.2.35, and if so, pursue it with the esound developers and/or the > FreeBSD sound people. > >> >> > o [2004/06/04] ports/67552 gnome Teach fontconfig about gs fonts >> >> What do anyone think of this? > > I think this is pending some other updates. You might want to ask the > author about it. I'm not opposed to doing what he suggests as long as X > is in line with whatever we decide. Ok, I also will ask why not install gs fonts in lib/X11/fonts. I personal rather to have all fonts in a place than multi-place. >> > o [2004/06/15] ports/67970 gnome ports textproc/libxml, >> > textproc/libxslt: >> >> Well.......I personal don't care about this since pkgconfig is mofo >> small. >> :-P I bet this one is going to take forever unless someone step in and >> create the patch(es). > > I don't see why we need to get anymore clever with pkgconfig. It is > small, and is generally needed on any desktop system. In case if anyone want to know my real thought of this PR. I disagree with this PR, because the purpose of install foo.pc is to run 'pkg-config --options foo'. Therefore, pkgconfig should be install. Tonight or tomorrow, I will start to touch some PRs. Cheers, Mezz >> > o [2004/07/07] ports/68747 gnome [patch] upgrade print/freetype2 >> >> How is it so far with the test? Does it still mess up the pretty font or >> what? All I know is that future xorg will need the new freetype2 or it >> can't be build. > > This needs to be suspended. The update to 2.1.9 can't happen right now > since it breaks too many important ports. X.Org was fixed to need 2.1.4 > or higher, so this is no longer an issue there. I've tested the 2.1.9 > update, and while rendering is better, the API changes make it > prohibitive right now. > >> > o [2004/07/09] ports/68879 gnome [patch] update >> > x11-toolkits/scintilla to >> >> Dunno, will have to check it. I don't really know scintilla that much. >> Since, it breaks with scite then one of us will need to check scite >> website to see if there has any of update that works with new scintilla. >> >> > o [2004/07/17] ports/69175 gnome audio/esound: when the esound >> > port is upg >> >> Umm, will need to make the changes to get this port respect the >> etc/*.conf. > > Yep. This should be done. > >> >> > o [2004/08/03] ports/69937 gnome [PATCH] www/mozilla: >> Work-around >> > for Mozi >> >> Someone will need to take a look at Mozilla CVS and create a patch for >> this one. Or, wait until next Mozilla update. > > I'll handle this. > > Joe > >> >> > o [2004/08/11] ports/70289 gnome graphics/dia : dia.xpm is not >> > installed >> >> I don't mind to check this, I will put dia.xpm in either >> share/gnome/dia/ >> or share/gnome/pixmaps/ instead. >> >> >> I just input the comments above to see if anyone agree. Also, I will >> like >> to see us to reduce all of those PRs. ;-) >> >> Cheers, >> Mezz >> >> > 10 problems total. -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opscuhtteg9aq2h7>