From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 15:55:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0803903 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com (mail-ie0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF15C48 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id c12so13757666ieb.37 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:55:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EYH9Hn2/JsIHALdVDGdjKlu56UBys+J1AKhoitW/yUE=; b=Tod94RwBnx9yetTf/Vjl0UYrE2uUuU7aAxYw9vjW+F4D9q1vZskaxaEAwlCB2c6j/I 2/XUE3yOSvgF4IftK832A2+b9lOQZavN0Mlhc4linV1CAVS/GN6RdUHtzwMFdRmUq8Jh nDnvva8V6UlS+kK9M8QgRjSiFs0qfK2UJHLD5CE7Rw7GXwAD4prM/7BxcGlQk8sbZYqX Yy7wXeVj6XC72XvVPntPJlqdOzver7/5wqz1M2+63v66/lst1OAHrBC62pqm8ijxCT68 FxXQIl4vvv/1fFm5rxjy3HvywO6jo0iandlfX8P5qaUvAuj/esimYZyShzIrQbQ+LZmM ay9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.92.72 with SMTP id s8mr1370730icm.0.1358956532872; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:55:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.16.73 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:55:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.16.73 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:55:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130123153724.GA79995@e-Gitt.NET> References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> <87mww00w89.fsf@Shanna.FStaals.net> <20130123153724.GA79995@e-Gitt.NET> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:55:32 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? From: Chris Rees To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:55:33 -0000 On 23 Jan 2013 15:37, "Oliver Brandmueller" wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Frank Staals wrote: > > This type of question has been asked quite a few times recently. At this > > point there is no svn version of csup, however there were people working > > on it (or at least: there is a svnsup project). For details please > > search recent ports or questions mailing list archives. As far as I know > > there is also no alternative svn-client. > > Pointer to svnsup is fine; it seems I just missed to the first hint. > > > I'm kind of surprised for the need of this though. Why not simply use > > portsnap if you are not actively developing ports? > > Well, for ports this is mostly fine, though on several places I prefer > to use csup (or svn now) even for ports, since I maintain quite a set of > local patches - this sometimes gives problems together with potsnap. > Where this is neede, I have a shared ports tree anyway, so the whole svn > setup is only needed in one machine. > > But my main concern is the system sources anyway. freebsd-update is not > feasible for me, as described in the original post. The single binaries inside the archives at [1] may help you out. I built them fairly recently, so they should be up to date (ish), and they should be fine on 9+. Just untar and use. Chris [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/svn-static/