From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb  1 20:09:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D8C16A4CE
	for <cvs-all@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 20:09:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E988B43D46
	for <cvs-all@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 20:09:43 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 77050 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2004 04:09:42 -0000
Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70)
  by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2004 04:09:42 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 22:09:41 -0600 (CST)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <opr2pjtpkk8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
Message-ID: <20040201220357.C7383@odysseus.silby.com>
References: <200402010756.i117uiWm094818@repoman.freebsd.org>   
	<20040201140055.C3097@odysseus.silby.com>
	<opr2pjtpkk8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru>
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_subr.c uipc_mbuf.cuipc_syscalls.c
 src/sys/sys uio.h
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 04:09:45 -0000


On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Jeremy Messenger wrote:

> > (Hopefully once we enable threading support in apache2 it will go
> > faster... hopefully.)
>
> Have one of you tried AppWeb[1] yet? I learned about it from the
> Slashdot[2] and it claimed that it outperforms Apache that can deliver
> about 3.5K pages per second on a Pentium-class system.
>
> [1] http://www.mbedthis.com
> [2]
> http://apache.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/27/2210229&mode=thread&tid=148&tid=185
>
> Cheers,
> Mezz

There are plenty of webservers that are faster than Apache... the problem
is, they are not Apache!

I'm interested in Apache performance because it's the most common
webserver out there, and is what most FreeBSD servers run.  So, any
increase in Apache performance benefits a large number of people.  Anyway,
I suspect that thttpd performs as well or better than AppWeb, so I'm not
too interested in taking a look at it.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack