Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:54:12 -0700
From:      Tim Gustafson <tjg@soe.ucsc.edu>
To:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Using AMD with NFS Mounts
Message-ID:  <CAG27QgQOt%2BFD_Ef5HuiJV2euTzPLXk-nNN8iJ1L-2DmU0fKPxg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <951954369.1342002.1346354568372.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
References:  <CAG27QgS5a121tWEdMpCv-tQNiSQ6pah9pryFLkyar-Vsu_Ud9g@mail.gmail.com> <951954369.1342002.1346354568372.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Although I'd see it as an option initially, planning on supporting both
> "forever" would just result in bloat and yet more software to try and
> maintain, imho. (Theoretical comment, at least until a solid autofs port
> exists.)

I don't see that as a valid argument against adding an autofs port.
Should we drop the port for Exim or Postgres, because ports for
Sendmail and mySQL exist?

-- 

Tim Gustafson
tjg@soe.ucsc.edu
831-459-5354
Baskin Engineering, Room 313A



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG27QgQOt%2BFD_Ef5HuiJV2euTzPLXk-nNN8iJ1L-2DmU0fKPxg>