From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 19:54:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E22F106564A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tjg@soe.ucsc.edu) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F2E8FC08 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadr6 with SMTP id r6so1426722dad.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:54:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucsc.edu; s=ucsc-google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dwbojQ+cWBoNzqQdUMmqO5X9C4jIYGIxayNNzfa8ZLs=; b=jFSc5JLiAlc2XInRfWNi0XsNCg/ahunPZ4pYJ6BKXa8Lw36aGMduuNLuid7H5JYyTO crBLNrQA/fRVPaKmHLUqp4VHAtmABDE8d+gUrcSlhFc4LjWrPJBxLjYuT5Zs1gCBiiHe 2PZFLesbtCV1gE3zvZVHrJ/h/g1YMg4+whD+c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=dwbojQ+cWBoNzqQdUMmqO5X9C4jIYGIxayNNzfa8ZLs=; b=F9u5Ult/UsyeScwh8zq3cXiJl4gyUZYSb4ILS+bdg7UV6VnM28T2kWGnuuWgXkMPUs qCBlEB/6Vb0s1asrUe7Uv5msH/zpZDk2z/3svApBQgdjSm9Za51gXR4dxJ4NF+OKQi/9 qEsSd48TzXT7Vmlf2MIC69zfOxx0dEJJ2wHsYRf3dG1RYuO2+DwwJ2IKSqCJqCxdrrxg +xDShesh40V7bJzBs3ISICK9UZeyunDpUOxY90LQHMpnkcR41KfVvUyg3Z3e9HriplaN a/mtWVN+/yc5jwT4Z9BX8BR5ejdzaJjfgeqBRGv6H5hfMAx3IR+cKWmF6up6L4n39JWi fJVA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.83.8 with SMTP id m8mr11223746pay.48.1346356452604; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:54:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.233.133 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:54:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <951954369.1342002.1346354568372.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <951954369.1342002.1346354568372.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:54:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: Tim Gustafson To: Rick Macklem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZKicl4/AF1JP2IES20IEwGdD6RDAmZnzOH9EK+pgIIyipjTeb9+yKUUcCUKG3Def7SxbU Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using AMD with NFS Mounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:54:13 -0000 > Although I'd see it as an option initially, planning on supporting both > "forever" would just result in bloat and yet more software to try and > maintain, imho. (Theoretical comment, at least until a solid autofs port > exists.) I don't see that as a valid argument against adding an autofs port. Should we drop the port for Exim or Postgres, because ports for Sendmail and mySQL exist? -- Tim Gustafson tjg@soe.ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A