From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 3 13:43:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E4216A4BF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp101.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp101.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [216.136.174.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1025443FBF for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:43:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aradorlinux@yahoo.es) Received: from 46.red-81-42-133.pooles.rima-tde.net (HELO estel) (aradorlinux@81.42.133.46 with login) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 20:43:42 -0000 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:43:46 +0200 From: Diego Calleja =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Garc=EDa?= To: Brett Glass Message-Id: <20030903224346.4bbbf208.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20030903131429.03609c60@localhost> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030902180402.028e2380@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030901143026.029afce0@localhost> <1062427379.15322.12.camel@suzy.unbreakable.homeunix.org> <29508631.20030901165843@mail.ru> <1062427379.15322.12.camel@suzy.unbreakable.homeunix.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20030901143026.029afce0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030902180402.028e2380@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030903131429.03609c60@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: sub_0@netcabo.pt cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ugly Huge BSD Monster X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 20:43:44 -0000 El Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:19:39 -0600 Brett Glass escribi= =F3: > You have "linux" in your e-mail address. Heh, there's a reason for that. diegocg@teleline.es is recognized as spam. But yes, I also use linux. Like a lot of people here= ... > So, you're suggesting that FreeBSD users put up with incompatibilities, > glitches, and an unethical licensing regime merely because they can > get something that KINDA works today? Yes. This is called "being realistic". Diego Calleja