From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 24 18:06:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0EB106566C for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from BATV+c93c927e216c7eec1c20+2800+infradead.org+dwmw2@casper.srs.infradead.org) Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:770:15f::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F3B8FC0C for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from macbook.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1:216:eaff:fe05:bbb8]) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QE3hv-0008NG-Pb; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:06:56 +0000 From: David Woodhouse To: Matthias Apitz In-Reply-To: <20110424160553.GA21295@sh4-5.1blu.de> References: <20110424160107.GA3824@tinyCurrent> <20110424160553.GA21295@sh4-5.1blu.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 19:06:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1303668410.6417.4.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Evolution] evolution-2.32.1 (FreeBSD HEAD) && calendar not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:06:54 -0000 On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 18:05 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > I've unpacked the source into /usr/ports/mail/evolution/work and renamed > the top level dir to .1; the patching to FreeBSD went (perhaps) fine but > the evo ./configure can't find its requirements, at least it is missing > this: Building evolution-2.32.3 requires evolution-data-server-2.32.3, but you still seem to have e-d-s 2.32.1. Btw, your In-Reply-To: headers are strange, breaking threading. What's up with that? -- dwmw2