From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 30 07:05:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6764B16A4CE for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:05:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C7F43D53 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:05:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gredman@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so9453rnk for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:05:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=g8nzPS4w2tj/kUh/LrDZ/Icx/Z7lD11QS5XB2YrOwvf2jMma2yomvABL2TtglTlB5fdiE0N2vJtiu2GWZuZhwaFiG3WGGaukVdOXEBirTUOGoMfYEna072AcX1NTL0tNGJa0jPhuLgli3IQTpQYURGTaQku2UHqd5QGNOok+mCk= Received: by 10.38.15.48 with SMTP id 48mr95622rno; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.209.56 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:05:24 +1300 From: Gareth Redman To: Subhro In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <184b087c04102915102f55e759@mail.gmail.com> cc: Chen Xu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-stable -- all CPU usage show 0% X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gareth Redman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:05:25 -0000 On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 11:06:09 +0530, Subhro wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:10:21 -0400, Chen Xu wrote: > > I am running 5.3-stable. since 5.3RC1, my CPU status from `top` show > > all zeros, like this. Can anyone tell me what is wrong? > > What makes you feel that something is wrong? If the processes are not > using the processor I would be pretty hapy about it . Getting > back to the point, processes on *nix boxes do not consume processor > like the Wind0ze family of OSses. SO its perfectly normal what u see. > I don't think it is normal, as even the idle state is at 0.00%. I would make sure that base is in sync with the kernel, as documented in . -- Gareth Redman