From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 13 07:36:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id C6FA61065678; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:36:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:36:36 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Edwin Groothuis Message-ID: <20080713073636.GB84930@FreeBSD.org> References: <200807122308.m6CN8GkF055922@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807122308.m6CN8GkF055922@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:36:36 -0000 On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:08:16PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > edwin 2008-07-12 23:08:16 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > . modules > Log: > Ports modules update at Saturday 12 July 2008 at 23:08 > > Revision Changes Path > 1.20091 +0 -0 CVSROOT/modules Is it really necessary to force updating modules in case of +0 -0 changes? ./danfe