From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 21:09:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533BB1065670 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA258FC18 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.98]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SjyW1f00327AodY5El97FT; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:09:07 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([98.248.41.155]) by omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Sl951f00E3LrwQ23fl96jE; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:09:07 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97E799B422; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:09:04 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20101103210904.GA81698@icarus.home.lan> References: <68E248E0-8619-4859-BFFE-1B5F5ABBC51F@airwired.net> <36E416FC-2F45-40C8-A7EC-0E7FA3B603A4@airwired.net> <4CD1BF92.102@freebsd.org> <20101103201155.GA80641@icarus.home.lan> <4CD1CD14.4090009@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD1CD14.4090009@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Dan Allen , Sergey Kandaurov , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Fatal trap 18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:09:07 -0000 On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:59:00PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 03/11/2010 22:11 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:01:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> [snipping since I wanna keep it terse] > >> > >> What I propose is that we try to find a resolution, because I suppose you can't > >> stay at the last working revision forever. > >> > >> P.S. so will you be trying the patch I proposed? > > > > Andriy, > > > > I can try your patch out on a Core 2 Duo (E8400) which helped test > > the latest Intel CPU topology change when you were looking for testers > > (and had no problem), and can also try it out on a Core 2 Quad Q8400 > > if need be. Both run amd64. > > But I suppose you don't have any problems? :) Correct; with the original patch you wanted tested, I saw no problems on either of the above systems. But I haven't rebuilt kernel since you MFC'd the patch. Anyway, it sounds like me testing isn't necessary since you have a pretty good idea of what's going on with Dan's setup. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |