Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      09 Jul 1997 15:16 EDT
From:      "Andrew Atrens" <atrens@nortel.ca>
To:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: no SYSVSHM in GENERIC now..
Message-ID:  <199707091923.MAA02400@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Does the X-server run any faster with MIT-SHM than without?
If it runs faster then I would vote to keep the stuff in GENERIC.

Andrew ( opinions mine, not Nortel's )


In message "no SYSVSHM in GENERIC now..", you write:

> >  Hmm, and why X work with GENERIC ?
> > (it' s print messages on console, but work fine)
> 
> Because it's not mandatory for the X server to support the MIT-SHM
> extention.  If you don't have it, it doesn't.
> 
> 					Jordan
>                         



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707091923.MAA02400>