From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 3 04:38:42 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA25227 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 04:38:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from metis.salford.ac.uk (metis.salford.ac.uk [146.87.232.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id EAA25210 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 04:38:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from M.S.Powell@ais.salford.ac.uk) Received: (qmail 12072 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 1999 12:38:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 12059 invoked from network); 3 Feb 1999 12:38:23 -0000 Received: from plato.salford.ac.uk (146.87.255.76) by metis.salford.ac.uk with SMTP; 3 Feb 1999 12:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 27359 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 1999 12:38:22 -0000 Delivered-To: catchall-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: (qmail 27350 invoked by uid 141); 3 Feb 1999 12:38:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 12:38:21 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Powell To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Can FreeBSD 3.0-STABLE successfully mmap block devices? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I notice the INN 2.1 docs mention that only Solaris can successfully mmap raw block devices. Does this still hold true for the recent FreeBSD 3.0-STABLE? Cheers. Mark Powell - System Administrator (UNIX) - Clifford Whitworth Building A.I.S., University of Salford, Salford, Manchester, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 5936 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key M.S.Powell@ais.salfrd.ac.uk (spell salford correctly to reply to me) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message