From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  9 18:25:29 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A7E1065676
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat,  9 May 2009 18:25:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jille@quis.cx)
Received: from istud.quis.cx (ip83-113-174-82.adsl2.static.versatel.nl
	[82.174.113.83])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DAE8FC14
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat,  9 May 2009 18:25:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jille@quis.cx)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (ille [192.168.1.4])
	by istud.quis.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id A516C5C20;
	Sat,  9 May 2009 20:09:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4A05C6CA.1080104@quis.cx>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 20:09:14 +0200
From: Jille Timmermans <jille@quis.cx>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lothar Scholz <scholz@scriptolutions.com>
References: <976698487.20090509182307@scriptolutions.com>
In-Reply-To: <976698487.20090509182307@scriptolutions.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Are named posix semaphores not implemented?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 18:25:29 -0000

Lothar Scholz schreef:
> Hello,
> 
> i tried to port a program using PCBSD based on FreeBSD 7.1
> and the small test program
> 
> #include <semaphore>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> 
> int main() {
>    sem_t* s = sem_open("foobar", O_CREAT|O_EXCL);
>    if (s == SEM_FAILED) perror("sem_open");
> }
> 
> raises a "bad system call 12" signal
> But from the manpage of sem_open tells me that it should
> be there since FreeBSD 5.0?
> 
> Please don't tell me that i have to rewrite the code.
> 
> 

Have you removed "options SYSVSEM" from your kernel configuration ?

-- Jille