From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jul 23 14:33:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D67D7F74F for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 14:33:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from astart2.astart.com (wsip-72-214-30-30.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.30.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCC03F16 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 14:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Received: from laptop_103.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v6NEX3Sw091702 for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2017 07:33:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Subject: Re: lang/gcc6-aux for head beyond __nonnull related issues: vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t related changes (and more) References: <9758023E-1526-41F9-9416-6AC8AD3201B5@dsl-only.net> <20170414201952.69ccc472@kan> <20170719220613.38149073@kan> <20170720061900.GF1935@kib.kiev.ua> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Patrick Powell Organization: Astart Technologies Message-ID: Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 07:33:03 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170720061900.GF1935@kib.kiev.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 14:33:10 -0000 On 07/19/17 23:19, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:06:13PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:50:04 +0200 (CEST) >> Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Alexander Kabaev wrote: >>>> it was suggested multiple times that the whole fixinc step is >>>> ultimately harmful and serves no useful purpose and probably should >>>> be disabled in built packages outright. Is there a reason not to do >>>> it? Even Redhat appears to do the slimming in their rpms: >>> For the more current lang/gcc* ports (not the gcc5-aux and gcc6-aux >>> ports which I do not maintain) I have now removed packaging the >>> headers processed by fixincludes, so any problems in that direction >>> should be gone. >>> >>> Gerald >> Thank you, Gerald! > This is very good news, thank you. Gcc should be much more usable now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Do you have a patch/revision ID for this change? I would like to test this with some ports that gcc failed on. -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Rd, Suite X Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting Cell 858-518-7581 FAX 858-751-2435 Web: papowell at astart dot com