From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jul 25 12:15:50 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192DB37B400
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu (dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.146.127])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8AC43E3B
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dedrick@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu)
Received: from dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6PJGF5Q011468;
	Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:16:15 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from dedrick@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu)
Received: from localhost (dedrick@localhost)
	by dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g6PJG0QY011465;
	Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:16:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:16:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Eric Dedrick <dedrick@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu>
To: Jud <jud@myrealbox.com>
Cc: <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, <adam@vectors.cx>,
	<freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: linux compatability broken
In-Reply-To: <1027622522.65b8affcjud@myrealbox.com>
Message-ID: <20020725141428.P304-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-questions.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-questions>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-questions>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Just to clarify, I mean that using portupgrade will
> (hopefully, and in my experience, almost always) take
> care of your dependencies during the upgrade process,
> thus saving you from the IMO less preferable
> alternative of running more than one version of a
> port.
>
> Have you tried portupgrade with linux_base (after a
> backup of the old linux_base port skeleton and
> installation of the new one) to see whether Maple
> is happy?

Yup.  portupgrading eliminates ld-linux.so.1, required by maple.  Thanks
for the suggestion, though.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message