From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 3 11:51:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3931065674 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from attila.bogar@linguamatics.com) Received: from mail.linguamatics.com (mail.linguamatics.com [188.39.80.203]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E10C8FC18 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.252.10.232] (random.linguamatics.com [10.252.10.232]) by mail.linguamatics.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82190EFB44C; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 12:51:14 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <501BBB35.4050703@linguamatics.com> Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:51:17 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Attila_Bog=E1r?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Chris Nehren References: <501A781D.2050506@linguamatics.com> <20120802150441.GE11061@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> In-Reply-To: <20120802150441.GE11061@isuckatdomains.isuckatdomains.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Who is responsible for Heimdal/Kerberos in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:51:17 -0000 On 02/08/12 16:04, Chris Nehren wrote: > Rather than sending repeated mails to the list (which you've already > seen get dropped on the floor), consider using the proper channels for > reporting bugs. Send a PR. See http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html for > more information. Unfortunately I have to disagree with you. I have come across 3 NFS related PR's so far, I manually patching my system with them against STABLE. Let's see them: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147998 - patch provided by the reporter, no resolution after 2 years. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162009 - patch provided by the reporter, no resolution after 9 month http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164933 - I reported with a patch, no resolution after 6 month Certainly I can report another PR with the problems I spotted and wait 2 years before I get an answer, but I don't call that problem solving. Or can you please explain what do you mean by "proper channel"? I can understand, that's pretty annoying (from my point SAD) that someone is sending problems to the mailing list and gets no hints. However I think, it's more sad, that the freebsd developer community is just ignoring the patches they are sent and doesn't considers quality assurance. Thanks, Attila