From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 2 19:12:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA27578 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 19:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cicerone.uunet.ca (root@cicerone.uunet.ca [142.77.1.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA27573 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 19:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from why.whine.com ([205.150.249.1]) by mail.uunet.ca with ESMTP id <115312-834>; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 22:12:20 -0400 Received: from why (why [205.150.249.1]) by why.whine.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA01819; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 22:12:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 22:12:12 -0400 From: Andrew Herdman X-Sender: andrew@why To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Andrew Herdman , Hal Snyder , Thomas David Rivers , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What's wrong with a bootable CDROM??? In-Reply-To: <8811.865298385@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Speaking of problems with the bootable CD-ROM. If you boot off the first > > disk, you can't insert the fixit cdrom (cd drawer is locked). And you > > can't boot off the fixit cdrom.... *sigh* maybe next time. > > "Interesting." :-) > > I didn't think the boot process would lock the CDROM this way; I suppose > I could make the 2nd CD bootable without too much trouble. Would people > prefer that? > > Jordan > I'd personally like to see both bootable. It's nice to able to install without using a floppy drive. And it'd be nice to be able to use the fixit disk.... without a floppy drive.. Andrew I really hate floppies.