From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 6 20:50:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83C61065672 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 20:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD078FC18 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 20:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p16Ko9lE065645 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 20:50:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p16Ko9Jt065642; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 20:50:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 20:50:09 GMT Message-Id: <201102062050.p16Ko9Jt065642@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Slaven Rezic Cc: Subject: Re: ports/154559: [patch] update astro/merkaartor to 0.17.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Slaven Rezic List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:50:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/154559; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Slaven Rezic To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Subject: Re: ports/154559: [patch] update astro/merkaartor to 0.17.1 Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 21:27:29 +0100 Edwin Groothuis writes: > Maintainer of astro/merkaartor, > > Please note that PR ports/154559 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/154559 The patch looks fine to me. That said, I think it's better if somebody else takes maintenance care of the port then to wait for maintainer timeouts. Maybe Oliver Heesakkers is interested, as he submitted the last two updates? Regards, Slaven -- Slaven Rezic - slaven rezic de Berlin Perl Mongers - http://berlin.pm.org