From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 17 16:04:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41189DC712A for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D127CE3E for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1CD96DC7129; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C462DC7128 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm5-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm5-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87747CE3D for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1502985648; bh=EpVq9ikaXBHY1Acm+vH0NHlohPrG1ZRQU/WQaGvK5+E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=k3fHkQ10gHqkJEre13dSbeL0biJYEGajntSTyytNetA+bKkxknpnwnSZJPvuuMX1f0Fm0fi/rB1jv4LixGc4Pk5JaJQqH1L5/o/YI/Zv5AOSGISJaGrM4FQB6H54eIyXBzA9IOPWs4lrW+Wf5KPo0wIrFTsghf5k+wMQl64GQpo= Received: from [66.196.81.160] by nm5.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Aug 2017 16:00:48 -0000 Received: from [98.139.244.49] by tm6.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Aug 2017 16:00:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 17 Aug 2017 16:00:48 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 463677.94772.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: a.4cYq8VM1m8KAoYriIpKjet.2nrB2oPd_6OveF.fUl_EtL .pemTjl76IEKjXIK8f7r9S7FmLgIa0yKcq.3cJCMAlcYER8j4uQio8heUZAh ciC.TlXdkFZsC7YQW4t4K.VYb_.gt85ykV9s8fz0lDgzp8MEQ4urhT7EUvXh QBIOYZPqFdI7nxGUvFXJuQkss0ISR2F6XlSAMGPlTK55Pm.R1bEQcwt8dAXc dMUE.nVHAgyN6LJK0EkmO1bGNveD.CZv0tIl4y04s3fp5QN72t0vdFRXHzBW b.5qjEYi4.jCJe6US7Mxf7WJ17ripxrBuEdYl1cz45CTwE_sxEGZGRuQfRAo UxjePplg7aACXAQLXOHsIPPvcAI3h2E4gba0TfkYTTgzudkV507HRGMOHDg_ tb2VhW64lvvtruJYziljkyj.RN.UBktLlO_HK_FzI3Z2PQIWfjoyeqUpHnIS 1fbv4ZbZ5b.ZuxVpTUjXoSZpNQxkO7iCjcfBobdeEcr8hUB9mlSWN8FpeRhw - X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: freebsd-ports Cc: herbert@mailbox.org Subject: Re: gtkmm30 fails to build under 10.3 Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:00:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9la9pch88dj02bs7ts4r1cfa7lgvnssh28__31177.0872948275$1502915924$gmane$org@4ax.com> <378r-8cln-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:04:02 -0000 [Default] On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:19:11 +0200 (CEST), "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: >Just try what jbeich@ told you. Or use pkg! The problem is twofold, really: it's the makefile that should satisfy the dependencies, but it doesn't; and evidently nobody ever bothered to test the bits to see whether they would build even when someone fills in the many gaps by hand. Although giomm is installed by glibmm, and I've installed the latest-and-greatest glibmm, that didn't help: it also wanted a newer gio, which is installed by linux-base-c6. Now I've upgraded that, but the build still fails because it doesn't like the gio bits installed by c6. And c6 wanted 2 scratch files mounted, so I did that too, and again rebooted to get everything on the same page. But now, after doing all that, I find that one of those changes broke xfce. The terminal emulator won't run: i/o error. Evidently these gtk ports were released untested, which was very unprofessional and did nobody any favors. If the maintainers are too busy to test-and-bless the bits for which they're responsible (I'm not criticising; I can *easily* understand how that could be so!), THE PORTS SHOULD BE STRUCK OFF, NOT DISTRIBUTED.