From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 12 23:28:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73F416A47E; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick@flirble.org) Received: from plum.flirble.org (plum.flirble.org [195.40.6.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0734543DBA; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:27:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nick@flirble.org) Received: from nick by plum.flirble.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GjOjm-000KAE-I5; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:27:42 +0000 Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:27:42 +0000 From: Nicholas Clark To: Olivier Houchard Message-ID: <20061112232742.GU6501@plum.flirble.org> Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Houchard , Joseph Koshy , Giorgos Keramidas , arm@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org References: <20061112142710.GE91556@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> <20061112133929.9194773068@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20061112140010.GA47660@rambler-co.ru> <20061112144230.GC2331@kobe.laptop> <20061112145151.GC49703@rambler-co.ru> <20061112151150.GA2988@kobe.laptop> <84dead720611120758r4f1cc6e8l8ca4432ba56f3f7f@mail.gmail.com> <20061112170711.GQ6501@plum.flirble.org> <20061112233434.GA12739@ci0.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061112233434.GA12739@ci0.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Organisation: Tetrachloromethane Sender: Nicholas Clark X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:59:29 +0000 Cc: arm@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:28:07 -0000 On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:34:34AM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > No, we're not using the mixed endian IEEE 64bits representation. We're > defaulting to softfloat VFP. What would be te point of switching ? >From my limited understanding of these things (mostly observing on the ARM Linux lists) absolutely none. The mixed endian IEEE representation is a complete pain, I'm unaware of any reason why it was chosen over a conventional little endian representation (probably back some time in 1987). Nicholas Clark