From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 28 16:01:56 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C023637B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mezzanine.vandalon.nl (cp25482-a.gelen1.lb.home.nl
	[217.120.68.13])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A3543F93
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from root@mezzanine.vandalon.nl)
Received: by mezzanine.vandalon.nl (Postfix, from userid 0)
	id 025252A907; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 01:01:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 01:01:54 +0200
From: Joris Vandalon <joris@vandalon.nl>
To: current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030428230154.GB2684@mezzanine.vandalon.nl>
References: <20030428224155.GA2684@mezzanine.vandalon.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030428224155.GA2684@mezzanine.vandalon.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Subject: Re: Debugging options in userland
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:01:57 -0000

On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:41:55AM +0200, Joris Vandalon wrote:

Ok, i'm sorry, please ignore my last mail i totaly explaind my question the wrong way.
(it seems the be a handicap of mine...)
I'll try and formulate it better.

Here it goes:

If I use a 5.0-RELEASE kernel the compile speed of a kernel is faster then if I use a
self compiled CURRENT kernel without the debug options in it's config.
So i'm thinking , is this because of compile options CURRENT uses to compile the kernel
(like make  and/or gcc options).
ans if so is it possible to disable these options.

Regards,
Joris

> Hello,
> 
> I don't know if i'm supposed to ask this, but i was wondering
> how to turn of all debugging options in userland.
> i found out that if I run current with my own kernel it took about
> 10 minutes to build a kernel on my p4 2.4 ghz.
> With the 5.0-RELEASE kernel on the same world it took about 7 minutes.
> I was wondering if there where any make/gcc options used in CURRENT 
> that would explain this.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Joris
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"