From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 17:47:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D517816A418; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F0113C4DD; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0MHl4WK090477; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:47:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:46:45 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200801181217.52788.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200801181217.52788.jkim@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801221247.02342.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/5521/Tue Jan 22 09:55:56 2008 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC] SysV SHM on 64-bit platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:47:06 -0000 On Friday 18 January 2008 12:17 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > While I was working on kern/113218, I realized it is a bigger > problem than I originally thought: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113218 > > Because fixing this PR breaks ABI, I had to make compat shims. But > the question is which branch to break? Since we are very close to > 7.0-RELEASE, the question became more complicated. A lot of people > are asking me to fix this PR because it is much needed fix for > large database installations, so I have to make a quick decision. > :-( FYI, re@ said "it's simply too late" for RELENG_7_0. Let's just shut up and fix ipc_perm and friends once and for all. ;-) Thank you all! Jung-uk Kim