Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:38:07 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'make -j16 universe' gives SIReset Message-ID: <20110813143807.GY48988@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20110613235144.GA12470@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20110526234728.GA69750@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20110527120659.GA78000@alchemy.franken.de> <20110601231237.GA5267@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20110608224801.GB35494@alchemy.franken.de> <20110613235144.GA12470@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:51:44AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2011-Jun-09 00:48:01 +0200, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> wrote: > >I think meanwhile I had a sound idea how to achieve the necessary level > >of protection in the MD code using just atomic operations instead of > >sched_lock, which further down would also allow the use of SCHED_ULE. > > Sounds good - let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > Could you please give the following patch with SCHED_4BSD (cpu_switch() still is missing support for SCHED_ULE) with something like -j128 buildworlds a try on your V890? http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/sparc64_replace_sched_lock_w_atomic.diff Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110813143807.GY48988>