From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 28 12:43:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BA637B95A; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:43:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA56071; Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:42:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:42:51 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Will Andrews Cc: Damieon Stark , Current Subject: Re: That des nolinks thang.. In-Reply-To: <20000228152747.A410@argon.blackdawn.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 02:21:33PM -0600, Damieon Stark wrote: > > Could somebody repost the flag intended for make.conf to > > keep the des libs from taking over libcrypt's links? Wrote it down, deleted > > it, lost the paper, and comenced feeling dumb ;) > > Feel dumber when you go to actually look at the freebsd-current archives. > http://www.FreeBSD.org/search/ - have fun! ;-) Better to use http://www.freebsd.org/mail/ The flag was NO_DESCRYPTLINKS in the version of the patch I posted, but it was called other names in other people's patches, and it's not yet in the tree. Based on the sentiment of others it will probably be (sadly) renamed to NODESCRYPTLINKS to conform to historical precedent. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message