From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 10:51:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4295106566B for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342D18FC1B for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb38 with SMTP id 38so5010823wyb.13 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 03:51:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J1Tu8uoeYOKa/Iyrj0eYw4h25WvkxOabmg86cQ55bZc=; b=b1s/Q7O6L8oKn9jb/i555n+xWa0++2xYDcEyUKcnDU05b9lQNGT2qKkHslWbVRt6S+ MIkevCF0wT7GPyaxfJtmjYgxR3CVwoqEJjkIehxL2Uxw6aFl5X09quK2JA6Q9mhV0PoY WTha+gs0/QmJoaMWvPQB1bnI+138OFGfbECQU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=X0XH34ghfiZN75hpX72LVZ20Cy7mjzXKV06do7qsjHyPYOUlsiUUCmEoFyy5W5diV3 U4yTtWfsl0jnhZ+oFZSHWTlsLWUsVUkickbDDvisZ3jmilNR7Paz2C59hix2Uwj4SPZ6 ZB7+BoFu2UUzRsU7dPc25VjoIjnSztED5mBls= Received: by 10.227.146.198 with SMTP id i6mr918880wbv.65.1287658292189; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 03:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x23sm922038weq.34.2010.10.21.03.51.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 03:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:51:21 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101021115121.282ecadb@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101021083124.GA50114@megatron.madpilot.net> References: <19264903.2523091287604404630.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> <20101020200247.GA60489@icarus.home.lan> <20101021083124.GA50114@megatron.madpilot.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Problem (again) with portsnap5.FreeBSD.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:51:34 -0000 On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards > portsnap5. > > I mean, all these machines are always choosing mirror number five. > > Some are behind squid proxies and using them for portsnap, so I think > this can be expected and caused in some way by some cached data, but > some are connecting directly. > > Is this in some way expected? If you define a cache environment variable the random choice is seeded by that to improve the caching. There may also be some weighting in the SRV record.