From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 17:40: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABEE37B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:39:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1D1dvW33990 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:39:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200102130139.f1D1dvW33990@harmony.village.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:38:05 PST." <20010212173805.P3038@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20010212173805.P3038@dragon.nuxi.com> <200102130120.f1D1KpU56194@mobile.wemm.org> <200102130131.f1D1VrW33790@harmony.village.org> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:39:57 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20010212173805.P3038@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : > What's wrong with shipping with say libc.so.505 in 5.0 and then say : > libc.so.645 in 6.0? : : HACK. I think it is an astheitc issue only. It is not a hack, but how ELF shared libarires work. However, since it is easy to move from 505 -> 5, there's no need to do it. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message