Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:22:14 +0100
From:      Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc:        freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails now in 7-STABLE
Message-ID:  <4992B4E6.1040607@quip.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20090207174104.Y93725@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
References:  <20090207174104.Y93725@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have a question about INADDR_ANY in relation to new multi-IP jails.
It was discussed some time ago as PR 84215 [wildcard ip (INADDR_ANY) 
should not bind inside a jail] 
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=84215 and it seemed fixed, 
but manpage for jail is still saying:

"Similarly, it might be a good idea to add an address alias flag such 
that daemons listening on all IPs (INADDR_ANY) will not bind on that 
address, which would facilitate building a safe host environment such 
that host daemons do not impose on services offered from within jails."

Can you please clarify the current state?

Miroslav Lachman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4992B4E6.1040607>