From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sun Oct 1 20:28:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FB737B503; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 826191C64; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:28:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 23:28:12 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Alfred Perlstein , Mark Ovens , Will Andrews , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: stolen script? Message-ID: <20001001232812.F38472@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <55614.970457144@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <55614.970457144@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:25:44PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 08:25:44PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > I'm afraid that such "blanket coverage" would not be even remotely > legal, according to the Bern convention or otherwise. All files must > bear the appropriate rcopyright text, especially given the fact that > we mix and match copyrights under /usr/src - /usr/src/gnu is obviously > not covered by src/COPYRIGHT for example. So why do we even have src/COPYRIGHT, then? To copyright itself? -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message