From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 25 9: 3:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5ADF37B409; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:03:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mvh@ix.netcom.com) Received: from netcom1.netcom.com (user-2initcl.dialup.mindspring.com [165.121.117.149]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA10343; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:02:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by netcom1.netcom.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BFE5413140; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:02:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Harding To: carlo@vis.ethz.ch Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <20010724201713.5E16E275B6@naboo.ethz.ch> (carlo@vis.ethz.ch) Subject: Re: GNU smalltalk, can't run version 1.96 References: <20010724201713.5E16E275B6@naboo.ethz.ch> Message-Id: <20010725160228.BFE5413140@netcom1.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is not entirely an answer, but check out the 'squeak' port, it's a smalltalk VM more like (identical to?) the Xerox one... - Mike H. Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:17:13 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: carlo@vis.ethz.ch (Carlo Dapor) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Dear fellow current people It is a quest for the Holy Grail I have embarked weeks ago. The harbours I have peered are: FreeBSD 4.3 and FreeBSD current. The last version I was able to build and run the tests is version 1.8.5, with some patches, both on 4.3 and current. But what I am not successfull with is neither with 1.96 or 1.95.x. I compiles on 4.3 and current, but at runtime I get a segfault. On 4.3, the offending showstopper is around the definition of primitive 184_185 (or similar), whereas on current it around the definition of primitive 203_204, I think. Interestingly, it compiles and runs smoothly on an SMP Linux 2.2.19. I also tried with gcc 3.0 on current, same result. Has anybody had more luck ? Tell me HOW, please. Ciao, derweil, -- Carlo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message