From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 12 15:28:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA03964 for current-outgoing; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:28:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA03953; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:28:51 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199611122328.PAA03953@freefall.freebsd.org> To: Dan Janowski cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ufs is too slow? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Nov 1996 18:20:09 EST." <199611122320.SAA25982@fnur.3skel.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 15:28:48 -0800 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Justin T. Gibbs writes: > > > > The main reason MS is looking to Veritas is that NTFS just doesn't perform > > when striped or mirrored. The NOW project at Cal did I/O comparison studie >s > > on x86 platforms using Solaris, FreeBSD, Linux and NT and found that while > > FreeBSD and Solaris could achieve upwards of 30MB/s through a striped file > > system, NT topped out at around 9MB/s. This was NT3.51 - they may have > > improved things for 4.0. > >where did the Linux ext2fs fall? Satoshi Asami would be the one to ask. >Dan > >-- >danj@3skel.com >Dan Janowski >Triskelion Systems, Inc. >Bronx, NY -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================